Tepco has a plan for Fukushima

The New York Times reports that Tepco has announced a timeline for securing the wrecked Fukushima 1 nuclear power plant:

The first part of the plan would take about three months and include installing a cooling system to lower the temperature in the reactors and spent fuel pools, as well as reducing radiation in the surrounding area, said Tsunehisa Katsumata, the chairman of Tokyo Electric.

The second part, which would take an additional six months, would include more pumping of water, the introduction of a new heat removal system and reducing the amount of contaminated water. The wreckage from three of the four most severely damaged reactor buildings would then be removed and the reactors inside would be covered.

While this vague outline is the most concrete recovery plan to date, it is of course subject to what is physically possible. Intentions, even with an approximate time scale, do not in any way prove that the plan is workable.

Let us remember that on the weekend following the quake and tsunami, Tepco moved mobile diesel generators onto the reactor site hoping to restart the cooling pumps using mobile emergency power, but found that the power connections were incompatible and the electrical switches had been destroyed by sea water. That plan had to be abandoned.

Then Tepco installed a fresh external power line and a new switch panel to restart pumps with restored grid power, but no further progress has been made in getting the original cooling pumps going again. That plan has been quietly abandoned and Tepco is still using temporary electrical pumps that inject fresh water from a nearby dam. There is no closed circulation system in place. Unlike the purified fresh water normally used for cooling, the dam water can contain small amounts of calcium that can clog pipes and valves.

Tepco no longer seems to publish how much water is being injected per hour into the three units. It also seems to have stopped publishing radiation figures for the drywell and suppression chamber, perhaps to avoid questions about a sudden major spike of radiation in unit 1 after the April 7 quake.

No explanation is being given about what is happening to all the injected water, how much re-condenses from steam into the reactor drywell (primary containment) or suppression chamber or leaks in liquid form into these areas and how much may be leaking outside the reactor containment or is released as steam (the containments of unit 2 and 3 are at atmospheric pressure). The NRC suspects that the circulation pump seals at units 1 through 3 are damaged, allowing water to leak. Probably Tepco doesn’t tell us where the water goes because nobody (including Tepco) really has any data.

It’s easy to say it will take three months to install a new cooling system, but if even one of the units still leaks large amounts of water too radioactive to go near it, that’s going to be a tough plan to implement. It’s not enough to get water into the reactor and to cool water or steam coming out of the reactor with a heat exchanger, all of this also has to happen without massive leaks that continually carry out radioactivity from damaged fuel rods. Many more afterquakes expected in the region for the rest of the year, some of them at magnitude 7 and greater, will complicate the recovery.

The recovery plan for Fukushima 1 will remain an uphill struggle for many months to come.

See also:

Fukushima watch 2011-04-15

Tepco has released the results of isotope testing in the water of the spent fuel pool of unit 4, which holds 1331 nuclear fuel assemblies:

  • Caesium 137: 93,000 Bq/l (half life: 30 years)
  • Caesium 134: 88,000 Bq/l (half life: 2 years)
  • Iodine 131: 220,000 Bq/l (half life: 8 days)

The figures suggests the fuel assemblies are damaged, but Tepco believes the damage is minor and think some of it may have been caused by fragments of the building collapsing into the pool after a hydrogen explosion and fire.

The pressure reading of one of the sensors in the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) of unit 1 has been steadily rising since March 22 even though the temperature reading has been fluctuating (rising and falling) over the same period. This suggests a buildup of hydrogen from a reaction between steam and zirconium or a buildup of hydrogen and oxygen from radiolysis (breakdown of water into its elements by gamma radiation). Unit one is supposed to have suffered the most severe core damage of the three units in operation when the quake struck.

The RPV is designed for a maximum pressure of 8.7 MPa. The pressure reading on April 15 was about 0.953 MPa. If too much hydrogen accumulates, the operators may be forced to vent the reactor pressure vessel and/or the reactor containment. To minimize the risks of a renewed hydrogen explosion, nitrogen has been pumped into the RPV since April 6, but venting from the containment could also release considerable amounts of radioactivity into the atmosphere, as during he first days of the disaster.

Mobile power generators and fire fighting equipment is being relocated to a higher location to be able to cope better with the possibility of a tsunami triggered by another strong aftershock.

Fukushima watch 2011-04-14

Tepco reports that when a concrete pump truck was used to take a water sample from the spent fuel pool of Fukushima 1 unit 4 on 2011-04-12, the water temperature there was 90C, i.e. close to boiling.

The water level in the 13 meter deep pool was 5 meter below normal and only 2 meters above the upper end of the fuel rod assemblies. 195 tons of water were added, raising the water level about 1 meter. No results have been announced yet for the analysis of the water sample.

Pumping of highly radioactive water from the basement of unit 2 was interrupted for 4 hours yesterday for a leak check at the condenser. No leaks were detected. Pumping was completed later that day. The spent fuel pool of unit 2 was topped up using an electric pump for 1 1/2 hours.

According to reports in Japanese media, the Japanese government is discussing setting up a backup site for itself at Itami airport in Osaka in case of a major disaster striking Tokyo.

Fukushima watch 2011-04-13

Since yesterday evening Tepco (or its subcontractors or sub-subcontractors) has been pumping highly radioactive water from the pipe and cable ducts under the turbine hall of unit 2 to the condenser storage tank. The presence of this water has been a major obstacle to reactivating cooling pumps or installing a new cooling system. The water has been in contact with damaged fuel rods and is loaded with fission products, with radiation levels exceeding 1000 mSv/hour.

A crack in a concrete wall near the cooling water intake building for unit 2 is being blocked with a steel sheet to stop radioactive water from leaking into the sea.

Yesterday a water sample was taken from the spent fuel pool of unit 4, which will be quantitatively analyzed for various radioactive isotopes to gain information about the state of the more than 1300 fuel rod assemblies in that pool. The spent fuel pool of unit 4 holds the biggest amount of long lived radioactive isotopes such as caesium 137 of all reactor cores and spent fuel pools at Fukushima 1. It has gaping holes in its walls and its roof was blown off in a hydrogen blast early in the nuclear disaster. When the cooling system failed due to a lack of external power after the March 11 quake, the fuel rods overheated and caught fire (it was that fire that prompted me and my family to head out of Japan the week after the quake…).

The last of five Putzmeister concrete pumps took off from Stuttgart/Germany for Japan in a Russian transport plane on Tuesday night. The remote controlled pumps have highly mobile arms 58 to 70 meters in length in 5 or 6 segments that are typically used for pouring concrete in dam or bridge construction, but can also be used for fire fighting. Between May and November 1986, 11 of the pump trucks were used to entomb the stricken unit 4 reactor in Chernobyl.

See also:

Fukushima rated same level as Chernobyl

NISA, the Japanese Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency has finally raised the Fukushima accident to level 7 (the highest) on the INES scale. Previously, the Chernobyl accident was the only one worldwide ever rated at that level. At the same time NISA stated that the amount of radioactivity released so far was about 10% of the amount released in Chernobyl. Most of the leaked radioactivity is assumed to have come from unit 2, which leaked highly radioactive water into its basement and from there into the sea.

The rating probably does not indicate a recent surge of danger to the public, but reflects a more realistic assessment of the existing data than the previous rating of 5, which would have put it on a level with the Three Mile Island accident in 1979: Only one reactor block suffered a melt down in TMI and the containment remained intact, versus 3 damaged reactor blocks and 4 overheating spent fuel pools in Fukushima and a damaged pressure vessel and containment in at least one unit. According to Gesellschaft für Anlage- und Reaktorsicherheit the revised rating primarily reflects the fact that a lot more than 10,000 terabecquerel (TBq) of Iodine-131 have been released into the atmosphere so far. The release of Iodine-131 and Cesium-137 lies somewhere between 370,000 TBq and 630,000 TBq.

US NRC assessment of Fukushima 1

The March 26 NRC assessment of the situation in the six units at Fukushima one makes for interesting reading. It suggests that water flow inside the base of the reactor pressure vessels is severely restricted by melted fuel and salt buildup. Water injected into unit 1 apparently does not contain any boron to guard against criticality. The seals in the recirculation pumps of units 1, 2 and 3 are assumed to have failed, effectively preventing the reactor cores from being filled high enough to cover all fuel, even if sufficient water could get past the melted fuel and salt crust: If the water rises any higher, it will simply leak out of the pumps. The primary containments of units 2 and 3 are assumed to be damaged. Spent fuel may have been ejected “up to 1 mile” from the spent fuel pools of unit 4 or unit 3 in a hydrogen explosion

See also:

Fukushima watch 2011-04-11

NHK reports that Tepco is using remote-controlled bulldozers and power shovels for clearing rubble around the wrecked reactor. While it’s good news that Tepco finally can perform some cleanup work without putting workers at risk, the bad news is how necessary such equipment may be. The New York Times reported on April 5 about a confidential document prepared by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

The document also suggests that fragments or particles of nuclear fuel from spent fuel pools above the reactors were blown “up to one mile from the units,” and that pieces of highly radioactive material fell between two units and had to be “bulldozed over,” presumably to protect workers at the site. The ejection of nuclear material, which may have occurred during one of the earlier hydrogen explosions, may indicate more extensive damage to the extremely radioactive pools than previously disclosed.

There was more nuclear fuel in the spent fuel pools of units 1-4 than there is in the reactor cores of these units.

Today I read the article “What Caused the High Cl-38 Radioactivity in the Fukushima Daiichi Reactor #1?” by F. Dalnoki-Veress, which discusses the possibility that a chain reaction could have happened in Fukushima 1 unit 1 even after the reactor had been shut down, based on the presence of chlorine isotope Cl-38.

Another quake knocks out pumps at Fukushima 1

Today at 17:16 JST a magnitude 7.1 quake with its epicenter close to the Fukushima reactor sites caused another loss of grid power, like during 9.0 quake one month earlier. Since the backup diesel generators had been destroyed by the tsunami on 2011-03-11 the electric pumps used for water injection for core cooling in the wrecked reactors stopped immediately this time. They didn’t start up again until 50 minutes later, during which time no water was being pumped into the reactor.

This raises the question of what would have happened if the reactor had stayed off the grid for days. After the big quake it took about two weeks before electric pumps could be used for cooling agin. Are there no mobile diesel generators available on site yet or if there are, is there no way to connect them to the temporary electric pumps used for water injection?

Tsunami was 15 meter high at Fukushima 1

More information on the tsunami on 2011-03-11: According to Tepco the devastating wave that hit the power plant was 15 meter high, flooding the surroundings of the reactors including outside the turbine halls up to a height of 5 meters.

Diesel problems at Higashidori nuclear power plant

After the 7.1 quake on 2011-04-07 at 23:23 JST that knocked out the grid supply to a shut down reactor at Higashidori, one of the emergency diesels was stopped due to an oil leak at 2011-04-08 at 14:06 JST. By that time only one of the three grid connections had been restored (at 03:30 JST). The other two connections came back online at 14:59 JST. The emergency diesel was repaired by the following morning, 07:00 JST.

What’s the recovery plan?

Currently 6000 liters of fresh water per hour are being injected into unit 1. Units 2 and 3 which contain more fuel elements are receiving 7000 liters per hour. There is no working cooling cycle. All this water must either be released somewhere as steam or leaking as liquid or building up inside the containment. If it escapes as steam or leaks out through cracks in the containment or from pipes it will contain highly radioactive fission products from the damaged fuel rods. While you can read about how much water is being injected, nobody seems to want to talk about where and how this water is coming out again and in what quantities.

As mentioned before in this blog, Sankei Shimbun has reported about a plan to build new cooling circuits for units 1, 2 and 3 using new pumps and heat exchanges located far enough away from the reactor blocks and their spent fuel pools to not expose operators to high levels of radiation. Tepco expects this work to take about a month, but it probably hinges on first clearing highly radioactive water from the basement of the turbine hall and associated tunnels. Considering the ongoing major afterquakes and the high levels of radioactivity in the reactor core to be cooled, this project is going to be extremely challenging.

There has been talk about covering the reactors in sheets with filters for emissions, which could happen around June. One would expect radioactivity levels under those sheets to be very high, considering that it will probably trap steam from the spent fuel pools, some of which hold damaged spent fuel rods. Basically, most of the radioactivity now being carried out over the Pacific by winds (or spread across Northeast Japan or the Kanto area, depending on the direction of the winds) should then stay behind, right outside the building. I suspect the sheets or tents won’t be put up until there is some kind of closed circuit cooling system in place, to minimize water vapor trapped under the sheets.

Toshiba has submitted a plan for decommissioning and cleaning up the reactors. The likely price tab will run into billions of dollars, considering experience from Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and the Vermont Yankee reactor.

See also:

Magnitude 7.1 quake, more power trouble

Today a magnitude 7.1 quake that registered an upper 6 on the Japanese scale near the epicentre in Miyagi prefecture exposed how vulnerable nuclear sites other than the wrecked plant Fukushima 1 still are.

The nuclear reprocessing plant and high level waste storage site in Rokkasho village, Aomori prefecture was without external power – again. Luckily its diesel backup generators are providing emergency power, as they already did after the site lost grid power on March 11.

Two of the three grid connections at Onagawa nuclear power station north of Fukushima are down. Backup diesels are working.

The Higashidori nuclear power station is also running on diesel power right now.

Luckily none of these sites got hit by tsunamis this time, but after the core damage and massive radiation release at Fukushima 1 following a loss of grid power and failed backup generators, any incident in which nuclear sites are only one or two failed diesel engines away from disaster will make a lot of people very nervous, especially as Fukushima 1 is still not secured almost four weeks later.

UPDATE 2011-04-08:

Grid power was restored at Higashidori at 03:30 JST on Friday, 2011-04-08. Grid power was restored at Onagawa the same morning.

Due to the loss of grid power the spent fuel pool cooling system failed for 20-80 minutes at Onagawa and Higashidori, which was not long enough for temperature to rise significantly.

Fukushima watch 2011-04-06

Tepco is now discussing installing a new cooling system in units 1, 2 and 3 of wrecked nuclear power station Fukushima 1 (Fukushima Daiichi), according to a report in Sankei Shimbun. Fresh water will be circulated around the reactor core using new electric pumps running on grid power and cooled in a new heat exchanger using sea water. Two of the five pipes leading into the reactor will be used for that purpose. The heat exchanger and pumps will be located further from the reactor building, exposing technicians to less radioactivity then inside the existing turbine hall. The company expects to be able to get this system working within about one month.

If the plan is successfully implemented, it would be a big step towards regaining control over the ruined reactors. Reestablishing some working cooling circuit is necessary to avoid having to entomb the reactor buildings in concrete, which would forever prevent a removal of the highly radioactive core from the tsunami-exposed site at the Northeast Japanese coast line.

Water leak plugged

The company also reports to have stopped the highly radiaocative water leaks at unit 2 using water glass (a watery solution of sodium silicate). Two previous efforts involving concrete and a water absorbent polymer had failed.

Meanwhile a “megafloat” previously used as a floating island for anglers is being converted at a shipyard in Yokohama for use as a water storage tank and will be towed to Fukushima around April 16. The 146 m long and 46 m wide vessel will be able to hold up to 10,000,000 liters of contaminated water from the reactor site.

Fear of hydrogen explosions

Tepco is currently injecting nitrogen gas into the unit 1 reactor building to dilute a potential buildup of hydrogen gas from overheated fuel elements. It is also considering nitrogen injections into units 2 and 3.

As it is suspected that hydrogen gas is accumulated inside reactor containment vessel, we are considering injection of nitrogen gas inside the vessel.
(Tepco press release)

Hydrogen explosions were responsible for severe damage to units 1, 3 and 4 in the first days after the cooling systems failed. The explosions occurred when gas had to be vented from inside the containment after pressure increased to twice the design limit of the containment vessel. Other Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) based on GE designs had been retrofitted during the 1980s with hydrogen burners that ignite leaked hydrogen before it has time to accumulate and mix with air in large quantities, but Tepco reportedly considered this retrofit an unnecessary expense.

Fukushima killed “oru denka”

Tepco announced halting its commercial push for “oru denka” (Japanese: オール電化, “all electric power”) households. Sales of “orudenka” goods such as heat pumps will be suspended. Until right before the earthquake and loss of 10,000 Megawatts of electric generation capacity in Fukushima and elsewhere, the company had been luring consumers away from using natural gas or propane for heating, cooking and hot water production and instead relying on Tepco’s now overloaded grid for all domestic power needs. The “eco cute” heat pumps previously sold by Tepco now compete for scarce power while Tepco has to struggle to bring replacement capacity online as quickly as possible to end rolling blackouts that are badly hitting the economy and are set to continue until the end of April. Depending on how quickly alternative power sources can be brought online, more severe power cuts are possible in the summer, the usual peak time for power load when most of Japan switches on air conditioners to escape near tropical humid heat. This summer may be the first in decades without widespread availability of air conditioning in Japan.

Sales of “orudenka” equipment is continuing at Kansai Electric Power Company and Chubu Electric Power Company, two companies not affected by the quake, but the latter has suspended TV advertising for the products.

Tepco has a near monopoly for electricity in Eastern Japan. It can import a maximum of 600 MW through an undersea cable from Hokkaido and a maximum of 1000 MW from Western Japan via DC couplings (Western Japan uses 60 Hz AC vs 50 Hz in Eastern Japan, so it takes more than simple lines and transformers to exchange power between those two grids). Until now this limited exchange of power had worked to Tepco’s advantage, as it kept out competition from suppliers in Western Japan, but Tepco’s customers are now paying the price for it, quite literally, as Tepco is raising their prices to encourage power savings.

Tepco will urgently have to import and start up gas turbines to replace lost capacity. GE in the US has announced it will ship gas turbines to Japan. So far restrictions on power usage are expected to last until summer 2012 in the world’s third biggest economy.

Fukushima watch 2011-03-31

Tomorrow it will be two weeks since I left Tokyo with my family. Every day we scan the news for clues for when it may be safe to return, but it’s not easy.

Achim Steiner, the executive director of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) questioned why “clear, precise information” on the nuclear situation in Japan was so difficult to come by.

The IAEA advised the Japanse government to check the need for evacuation in Iitate village, some 40 km from Fukushima because levels of I-131 were too high. It was the environmental organisation Greenpeace and not the Japanese government that had first collected data there.

Radiation in seawater near the plant exceeds legal limits by 4385 times, the highest level ever. Ditches filled with radioactive water are within 10 cm of overflowing and sandbags and cement are being used to prevent them spilling.

Water injection into the partially uncooled overheated reactor cores has been cut back for fear of radiactive water leaking back out and obstructing efforts to restart electric cooling pumps. Some of the water inside the plant is radiating 1000 millisieverts per hour, exposing the workers to the recent raised maximum annual dose for nuclear emergencies (250 mSv) within only 15 minutes (or within 6 minutes before the raise).

Only the spent fuel pool at unit #1 has a concrete pump attached for topping up cooling water. Other pumps of the same type are to be flown in from Germany now. No spent fuel pool water temperatures are available for unit 1, 3 and 4 (which hold 292, 514 and 1331 fuel assemblies) because of “measuring instrument malfunction”. Only the temperature for the pool in #2 (with 587 assemblies) is known. Seawater was still being used for topping up pools, which means salt will accumulate when the water boils or evaporates

Fukushima holds 1780 tons of nuclear fuel, versus 180 tons in Chernobyl. The majority of that fuel is held in spent fuel pools which are outside the containment building. The pool in unit #4 holds the largest number and also the most radioactive of the spent fuel assemblies. Unit #4 shares its control room with unit #3, which looks the most damaged in aerial shots. Unit #4 itself has holes 8m by 8m in size in its wall.

The containment building at unit #2 is at or near atmospheric pressure (0.11 MPa absolute), indicating a crack or open valve. At least a portion of the fuel rods probably already melted through the pressure vessel onto the concrete floor of the containment.

Fukushima: A future cast in concrete

If, as seems increasingly likely, the cooling pumps can’t be restarted in each and every block of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, we will lose all the blocks due to release of excessive radiation from whatever block melts down first. The only option left will be to seal the power station under a huge amount of concrete, a sarcophagus like in Chernobyl.

Two weeks after the quake and tsunami hit the plant, the situation is no better than it was, if anything it has deteriorated since then, despite how it has been spun by Tepco and the government in the Japanese mass media.

On the upside, external power has been restored to inside the control rooms and limited cooling has been established via splashing water from outside and injecting water through the fire extinguisher system. Freshwater is being used for that now, after nothing but seawater had been available for two weeks. The use of will relieve worries about problems from salt buildup inside the plants (over 100 tons of sea salt are supposed to have accumulated already).

On the downside, the basements of the turbine halls under units 1 through 4 were flooded with highly radioactive water (#1: 0.4m, #2: 1m, #3: 1.5m, #4: 0.8m). On Thursday three workers were injured while trying to replace a cable in the turbine hall basement for unit 3 when they walked in the water which had not been observed the day before. It contained a staggering 3.9 million becquerels of radioactivity per cubic centimeter which is 10,000 times the usual amount inside the reactor (or 13 million times the Japanese safety level for drinking water for adults). That water is now being pumped out, but Tepco is not sure how to dispose of it.

An analysis of radioactivity in water from the basement of unit #1 showed that most of the radioactivity (1.8 million becquerel) was from cesium-137, which has a half life of 30.2 years. This is much more long lived than iodine-131 (half life: 8 days), which so far dominated tests around Japan before. Besides cesium-137 the water in unit #1 contained cesium 134 (160,000 becquerel), cesium-136 (17,000 becquerel) and iodine-131 (210 000 becquerel). The dominance of cesium-137 is a major worry: While radioactivity from iodine-131 drops off rapidly within weeks and months, pollution from cesium-137 will be dangerous for decades and centuries.

Both cesium and iodine are fission products normally contained within the uranium oxide (or uranium/plutonium oxide in the case of unit #3) of the fuel rods inside zirconium alloy tubes held inside a thick steel pressure vessel (reactor core) inside a reinforced concrete containment vessel. In the case of spent fuel rod assemblies in the storage pools there is no pressure vessel or containment.

When the fuel rods overheat the zirconium alloy will melt at temperatures over around 1800C, allowing volatile fission products to diffuse out of he oxide tablets into the pressure vessel or the storage pool.

It is not clear if the highly radioactive water in unit 1, 2, 3 and 4 came from the reactor core or from a storage pool. In the latter case, there could either be a leak in the pool (it consists of a stainless steel liner inside a reinforced concrete structure) or the pool could have overflowed during attempts to refill it so it doesn’t boil until dry.

If the water came from the reactor core it could be due to a damaged containment and reactor core or it could be due to problems with the pipes or valves connecting the reactor to the adjacent turbine hall.

Either way the leaks make the turbine hall a hostile environment for technicians trying to restore the cooling system for the damaged reactors. The reactor cores in unit 1, 2 and 3 would have to be cooled for about the next 2 years to prevent the fuel rods from melting through the reactor core. This will be next to impossible to achieve without reactivating the cooling pumps and restoring their control system.

With significant damage to the fuel rods as presumed by Tepco, any primary cycle cooling water will be loaded with dangerous fission products. Dealing with leaks of coolant or bleeding pockets of air and gas from coolant pumps as needed before resuming pumping could expose workers to life threatening doses of radiation. Under these circumstances, if any of the pumps turn out to be damaged there is little prospect of being able to replace them, even if spare parts could be manufactured and brought in.

The bottom line is that getting proper cooling working again for all cores at Fukushima Daiichi is a long shot, especially considering how long the cooling will still be required. The power station units have been damaged so badly by overheating, hydrogen explosions and sea water flooding that time is running out. The more radioactive fission products are leaked, the more difficult it becomes for humans to work and survive inside the plant. There will come a point when all of Fukushima Daiichi is a death zone that no one can enter and get out again alive.

At that point the only option is to find a way to completely and permanently seal the plant off from air and water by entombing it inside concrete like the stricken block in Chernobyl. The reason Tepco has not started doing that yet is not that they’re still trying to salvage their property: Since seawater and boron was pumped into the reactor cores on the first weekend the reactors have already been beyond rescue, as boron is a “neutron poison” and seawater is highly corrosive. At best the reactors would have to be mothballed indefinitely after that. They could never have been restarted to provide power again.

Why then is Tepco not pouring concrete over the reactors yet? Partly the answer may be that it’s like trying to dismount a tiger one is riding. While the reactor is still exposed to the outside one can still try to do things like cooling it down with fire hoses or replenishing water in the spent fuel storage pool. Once it is partly buried under concrete that becomes more and more difficult. As a result radioactivity might spike before the concrete could securely enclose the mortally wounded reactors.

A durable sarcophagus in this earthquake zone not only requires ample quantities of concrete but also steel reinforcements, which is hard to do if humans aren’t safe near the reactors. This will be no ordinary construction job by any means. The construction effort may have to involve remote controlled vehicles and other novel engineering approaches.

A primitive approach could simply bury the entire plant area under a mountain of concrete, perhaps piled up via remote-controlled trucks and bulldozers, later sealed with a skin of reinforced concrete to deal with earthquakes.

One would hope that Tepco started work on various alternative plans for increasingly severe scenarios as soon as they realized the cooling systems failed on March 11. Unless a miracle happens and all reactor cooling systems can be restored quickly, a concrete “Mt. Fukushima” probably is the only way to save Eastern Japan or all of Japan from massive radioactive pollution.

UPDATE (2011-03-28):

The lack of discussion of the concrete sarcophagus solution by Tepco suggests they are still committed to a “Three Mile Island” solution: Try to reestablish adequate cooling, wait about 5 years and then open the containment and pressure vessel to remove the radioactive mess in the core, clean up the contamination in the building. In other words, they still see the accident as a TMI-like level 5 accident and hope to keep it there, even though both the French nuclear safety authority ASN and its counterpart in Finland have rated the accident as level 6 on the INES scale.

The gradual melt-down of cores 1, 2 and 3, the uncertainty about whether the containment of block 2 is cracked or not plus the problems with the spent fuel storage pools 1, 2, 3 and 4 raise serious questions about how realistic a TMI-type recovery and cleanup is.